Negative Effects of Globalization - Chemical Waste and Air Pollution
95
Negative Effects of Globalization - Chemical Waste and Air Pollution
Economic activity often result in the negative effects of globalization, such as chemical waste and air pollution. Still, the cost of cleaning these effects up is not included in the price of a product. In many cases, specifically in the developing world, manafacturers take advantage of lax regulations and cause air pollution and chemical waste without restraint.
Some economists studying globalization have come up with a theory that this behaviour follows a pattern first discovered by economist Simon Kuznets. According to Kuznets' theory income inequality keeps increasing with per capita income until a critical income level is reached, after which inequality declines again. The graphic representation of the Kuznets theory is called the Kuznets curve, and it resembles a bell curve.
If Kuznets logic can also be applied to the relationship between income and environment, it results in a 'environmental' Kuznets curve, which shows the negative environmental effects rising with per capita income. But once a tipping point is reached, a higher per capita income start correlating with an improving environment. This can clearly be observed in developing nations where per capita income is low, and more pressing social needs enjoys priority over environmental regulation. For a while economic development means more negative environmental effects like air pollution and chemical waste, but as soon as a country becomes more developed, more regulations are set in place to protect the environment. First, environmental harm is stabilized, and as income rises further, some of the new wealth is used to reverse the damage already done.
This theory holds important implications for the debate about global warming, because it implies that greenhouse emissions from developing countries(especially China and India) will continue until a tipping point in per capita income is arrived at. It turns out that very little empirical evidence exists to prove this theory however. The relationship this theory describes has so far been shown to only apply to urban concentrations of sulfur dioxide.
The environmental Kuznets theory rests on two assumptions, which is that environmentally friendly production is more expensive than environmentally unfriendly production, and that poor countries can't afford environmentally safe production until they reach a certain income level. These assumptions could be false however. Denmark's economy have recently grown by 50% without an increase in greenhouse emissions, thereby disproving the first assumption. Denmark achieved this by shifting 22% of its electricity generation to wind power. The success of ecolabeling, a market-orientated program that promotes environmentally friendly products, also suggests that economic growth does not always have to coincide with environmental harm.
The environmental Kuznets theory states that economic growth in poor countries will always coincide with negative environmental effects until a certain income level is reached.
Kuznets Curve
More Globalization
- Globalization - The Benefits of Trade
Globalization - The Benefits of Trade - The benefits of trade allows countries to specialize, increase productivity, and ultimately improve living standards everywhere. Find out more here. - Globalization - The Barriers to International Trade
Globalization - The Barriers to International Trade - Find out what is meant by barriers to international trade and how it is important to globalization. - Globalization - When did Globalization Begin?
Globalization - When did Globalization Begin? - Find out the answer to the question when did globalization begin here, and if indeed there is such an answer. - The Winners and Losers of Globalization
The Winners and Losers of Globalization - There are both short term and long term winners and losers of globalization, and they are not necessarily the same parties. Find out here why. - Definition of Globalization
Definition of globalization - Does anyone really have an exact definition of globalization? Find out in this article what is meant by globalization. - Negative Effects of Globalization - Corruption
Negative Effects of Globalization - Corruption: Globalization has potential gains for all, but there is also negative effects associated with it, namely corruption. Find out why on this page.
Subscribe to Your Kowledge's RSS Feed
- http://hubpages.com/author/Your+Knowledge/latest/?rss
For more educational articles like these to improve your knowledge and impress your friends.
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (3)
- Funny (1)
- Awesome (2)
- Beautiful (1)
- Interesting (1)
Leave Me a Comment About Negative Effects of Globalization - Chemical Waste and Air PollutionLoading...
I enjoyed learning about the Kuznets Curve. Denmark is a fascinating place and the exception. Is Denmark's wind power as ugly as the wind power here in the States? I find the airplane structures visual pollution to God's landscape - love helping the environment.
Hi Your Knowledge, i am very interested with your hub, and i would like invite you to write on my blog. I will give backlink to your hubs and you'll be the author of the article. If you are interested, Contact me. jaanfeae@gmail.com
yes that is very true, its very nice of you for sharing such superb knowledge, being in chemicals industry i also feel bad about this pollution and all
This is a true account. i appreciate author's efforts in collecting the facts and presenting it in cogent manner.
The effects of Globalisation are multi-dimentional.They have replaced small scale venders by multinational companies. Goods needed for daily use have become costlier.Medicines have become costly. Unnecessery technologies have pushed out simple technics by which dagnosis was being made.Simple things have become complicated.
Very informative article. Thank you!
I did'nt hear you mention the word "empire" in any of your globalization writings?? what gives? we ARE an empire with client states and a "sphere of influence"
globalization(to me) means re-inforcing the corporate status quo. yes corruption is most pervasive in Africa, but no country is clean!! power corrupts!! period!
Veryyyyyyy Nice
nice
This is such an alarming issue and need not to be limited to words alone but action should follow as well.
The effects of air pollution are diverse and numerous. Air pollution can have serious consequences for the health of human beings, and also severely affects natural ecosystems. Because it is located in the atmosphere, air pollution is able to travel easily. As a result, air pollution is a global problem and has been the subject of global cooperation and conflict.
This is an interesting theory actually, but responding with apathy in response to the promise of future action isnt exactly a proactive strategy towards combating global pollution. As this is a global problem, the countries with the greatest economic stability should help countries below basic environmental standards to clean up their means of production.
I can also see a hole in this argument. Countries like China have reached this supposed tipping point where they should start bringing environmental standards to the forefront of their concerns, but the imbalance of power within their government prevents this. For example the Ministries in-charge of economic growth have far more power than the Ministries in-charge of environmental protection, resulting in the continuing poor enforcement of environmental standards. So what is the solution to this?
Should the UN be allowed to create a baseline international set of environmental standards to combat this global pollution problem? As pollution affects every present and future person on planet Earth I say yes. Thoughts?
GOOD
Interesting! However, the problem is, no one knows when the tipping off point would be reached and in the present context, having a large population would mean the tipping off point would be far higher than that for most developed countries.
Source: The Bedside Baccalaureate
















nick247 2 years ago
Interesting argument, the problem with pointing at Denmark however is that it was already a developed economy, whereas economies like India and China are essentially going through the industrial revolution that Anglo-Saxon countries went through in the 19th Century. The problem with global warming is that if we wait for the tipping point of per capita income, it may well be too late. We're already lagging behind in developed economies.